How to Critique a Research Article | Ausmed

 

critiquing a research article

How to Critique an Article. Every day students get dozens of new assignments of all shapes and kinds, so it is more that simple to get lost in all of the rules and guidelines. One of such tasks is a critique and often we are asked ‘what is an article critique’, as it is not a regular task . Apr 27,  · To enable the critique of this article the Caldwell critiquing tool () will be utilized. (Appendix 2) Research critiquing is a valuable skill, to gain as it enables student nurses to develop and improve knowledge and skills and also adheres to the NMC code of conduct (NMC, ). A systematic approach to reading and critiquing a research article serves as a foundation for translating evidence into practice and policy. Every nurse can acquire this skill. Louise Kaplan is director of the nursing program at Saint Martin’s University in Lacey, Washington. At the end of this article is a checklist for evaluating an article.


How to Write an Article Critique. Example APA at KingEssays©


Nurses use research to answer questions about their practice, solve problems, improve the quality of patient care, generate new research questions, and shape health policy. Nurses who confront questions about practice and policy need strong, high-quality, evidence-based research. Research articles in peer-reviewed journals typically undergo a rigorous review process to ensure scholarly standards are met.

Nonetheless, standards vary among reviewers and journals. This article presents a framework nurses can use to read and critique a research article. You may want to have a research article available to read and critique as you consider the following questions. A good title will pique your interest but typically you will not know until you are done reading the article if the title is an accurate description. The abstract provides a brief overview of the purpose of the study, research questions, methods, results, and conclusions.

Some people use the abstract to discuss a study and never read further, critiquing a research article. This is unwise because the abstract is just a preview of the article and may be misleading. A good introduction provides the basis for the article. It includes a critiquing a research article of the problem, a rationale for the study, and the research questions. When a hypothesis is being tested, it should be clearly stated and include the expected results.

When a theoretical framework is used, it should inform the study and provide a rationale. The concepts of the theoretical framework should relate to the topic and serve as a basis for critiquing a research article the results.

The literature review provides a context for the study. It establishes what is, and is not known about the research problem. Publication dates are important but there are caveats. Most literature reviews include articles published within the last 3 to 5 years.

It can take more than a year for an article to be reviewed, revised, accepted, and published, causing some references to seem outdated. Literature reviews may include older studies to demonstrate important changes in knowledge over time.

In an area of study where little or no research has been conducted, there may be only a few relevant articles that are a decade or more old. In an emerging area of study there may be no published research, in which case related research should be referenced.

If you are familiar with the area of research, review the references to determine if well-known and highly regarded studies are included.

The methods section provides enough information to allow the study to be replicated. Components of this section indicate if the design is appropriate to answer the research question s.

Independent and dependent variables should be described and terms defined. For example, if patient falls in the hospital are considered the dependent variable, or outcome, what are the independent variables, or factors, being investigated that may influence the rate at which patient falls occur? The analytical approach relates to the study questions and research design. A quantitative study may use descriptive statistics to summarize the data and other tests, such as chi squares, t-tests, or regression analysis, to compare or evaluate the data.

A qualitative critiquing a research article may use such approaches as coding, content analysis, or grounded theory analysis. Results should be clearly summarized in the text, tables, and figures. Tables and figures are only a partial representation of the results and critical information may be only in the text. In a quantitative study, the significance of the statistical tests is important.

Critiquing a research article presentation of qualitative results should avoid interpretation, which is reserved for the discussion. It is essential that the limitations of the study be presented, critiquing a research article. These are the factors that explain why the results may critiquing a research article to be carefully interpreted, critiquing a research article, may only be generalized to critiquing a research article situations, or may provide less robust results than anticipated.

Examples of limitations include a low response rate to a survey, not being able to establish causality when a cross-sectional study design was used, and having key stakeholders refuse to be interviewed. The discussion serves as an opportunity to explain the results in respect to the research questions and the theoretical framework. Authors use the discussion to interpret the results and explain the meaning and significance of critiquing a research article study.

Relevant policy recommendations are also important. Evaluate if the recommendations are supported by the data or seem to be more of an opinion. A succinct conclusion typically completes the article. Determine the scientific merit of the study by evaluating the level and quality of the evidence. Consider what you learned and decide if the study is relevant to your practice or answered your question as well as whether you can implement the findings.

A systematic approach to reading and critiquing a research article serves as a foundation for translating evidence into practice and policy, critiquing a research article. Every nurse can acquire this skill. At the end of this article is a checklist for evaluating an article. Leonard Corgan Library. Reading a research article. Accessed September 5, Oliver D, critiquing a research article, Mahon SM. Reading a critiquing a research article article part I: Types of variables.

Clin J Oncol Nurs. Reading a research article part II: Parametric and nonparametric statistics. Reading a research article part III: The data collection instrument. Guidelines for evaluating research articles. Discussion explains the results in relation to the theoretical framework, research questions, and significance to nursing.

Decide if the study is applicable to your practice. This article was helpful in breaking down this information very basic to get a clear, concise understanding. Now I can take this information and go to the next level in my discussions. As I only have 2 more classes to get my degree, critiquing a research article, I wish I knew this info 2 semesters ago! I will also pass this along to coworkers that will be going back to school in the near future.

G students to understand the concept but these guidelines are helpful to learn for novice. This is great,am looking for guilgline on how to do research critique and this is just the solution. Thnks weldone, critiquing a research article.

I am currently taking a Health Service Research course and was not sure how to sturcture my assignment. Thanks for posting this article! Great timing; have just been asked to review and article and you provide the guide! Will share with colleagues. I will be passing this article on to a friend who is taking a nursing research class. This article is a great reference for nursing students. Your email address will not be published.

Yes, add me to your mailing list. Protect your nursing license. Upon graduation, nurses are expected to uphold professional standards, guidelines, and principles from the American Nurses Association ANA. An American nurse in London: Is it worth it?

What my students taught me about civility. Collaborating with faculty and taking a leadership… Read more…. The vital role of health literacy. Healthcare professionals should know that most, if not all, patients have low health literacy, according to The Joint Commission.

The… Read more…. Medication with food: What does it really mean? Downtime: The time to nurse. Not long ago, I walked down a hospital corridor of a medical-surgical unit and found all the work stations on… Read more…. Before you go! Sign up today! Yemen Zambia Zimbabwe. Toggle navigation. Click Here to Login. News Off the Charts Insights Blog. Infection Control Wellness Research Professionalism Search for: Advanced Search. Current Issue.

Digital Edition. Author Guidelines. Submit an Article. Send a Letter to the Editor. Editorial Advisory Board.

 

Scholarly Article Critique Student Example

 

critiquing a research article

 

Step-by-step guide to critiquing research. Part 2: quaiitative researcii Frances Ryan, Michael Coughlan, Patricia Cronin Al>stract As with a quantitative study, critical analysis of a qualitative study involves an in-depth review of how each step of the research was undertaken. Qualitative Cited by: How to Critique an Article. Every day students get dozens of new assignments of all shapes and kinds, so it is more that simple to get lost in all of the rules and guidelines. One of such tasks is a critique and often we are asked ‘what is an article critique’, as it is not a regular task . A systematic approach to reading and critiquing a research article serves as a foundation for translating evidence into practice and policy. Every nurse can acquire this skill. Louise Kaplan is director of the nursing program at Saint Martin’s University in Lacey, Washington. At the end of this article is a checklist for evaluating an article.